[51]
Roscius, then, suborned
Cluvius as a false witness. Why did he do it so late? Why did he do so when the second
payment was to be made, not when the first was? for already he had paid fifty thousand
sesterce. Secondly; if Cluvius was, by this time, persuaded to tell lies, why did he say
that a hundred thousand sesterces had been given to Fannius
by Flavius, rather than three hundred thousand; when, according to the mutual agreement,
a half-share of it belonged to Roscius. By this time you see, O Caius Piso, that Roscius
had made his demand for himself alone, and had made no demand for the partnership. When
Saturius perceives that this is proved, he does not dare to resist and struggle against
the truth. He finds another subterfuge of dishonesty and treachery in the same track.
This text is part of:
Search the Perseus Catalog for:
This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 United States License.
An XML version of this text is available for download, with the additional restriction that you offer Perseus any modifications you make. Perseus provides credit for all accepted changes, storing new additions in a versioning system.